Warhammer and Sex
Corsets everywhere |
Go and scan the shelves of your local Warhammer or gaming store—what do you see? Behind the Eavy Metal paint schemes and shiny new logos, you’ll find boxes and boxes, rows and rows, of little plastic space and fantasy people showing off their chiselled abs, ten inch-wide arms and metal corsets. From Khornate priests to Sanguinary Guard, from Battle Sisters to Blissbarb Archers, so many of your favourite characters, if you push past your desensitisation to their forms, have been literally sculpted with traditionally beautiful bodies, representations of the traditional sexualised form, weapons slung aside, chests forward. And yet, as RS Benedict puts it:
“A room full of beautiful, bare
bodies, and everyone is only horny for war.”
It might
be tempting to dismiss the lack of sexuality in the setting, beyond the aforementioned
aesthetic sensibilities, as a function of its satire. Afterall, the essay I just
quoted is speaking on Starship Troopers—a military satire and one of 40k’s
major pop-culture influences. There is, after all, dark humour in the fact that
there are essentially no references to anyone in this setting getting it on,
despite looking like gods and goddesses, only interested in using their (problematically
traditional) beautiful bodies to perfect their ability to fire oversized weapons
(oop). If 40k and AoS were just sandbox games with lore only existing as
a backdrop to set your fighting characters against (like some hypersexualised
video games or a short-form movie), I think that could be the end of this discussion.
The satire would work.
But the worlds of Warhammer have
evolved so rapidly over the decades that they’re no longer just satire. There
are satirical elements, obviously, and broadly, I believe 40k is satirical
still: an empire collapsing under its own lies and hubris, its useless leader
literally a corpse, eternally hungry for war and death for reasons
ill-remembered. But the lore of the games is so much broader now, with
thousands of novels, novellas and audio dramas, official animations and a
potential TV series in the works—the more Warhammer is explored and fleshed out,
the less the 1:1 allegories function and the more the settings grow. 40k isn’t just
a satire now; it’s a universe full of heist and crime novels, horror shorts and
whimsical adventures played, in many cases, and by some particular authors,
completely straight. So, as the worlds of Warhammer are expanded upon and made
more three-dimensional and domestic—where’s the sex?
This feels like a needless thing
to summarise, but in an era of all-time low media-literacy surrounding sex, I think
it bears repeating: sex functions not only as a reproductive activity (for creating
future Imperial Guardsmen, no doubt), but also as a recreational one and most
importantly here—both in wider fiction and reality—it is something that
motivates and kills. How many conflicts (not just war, but socio-political) in
the present or history have been motivated by an affair, a desire for marriage
or existential loneliness? The number is beyond count. And yet, the main
conflicts in Warhammer appear to be motivated by uncaring demi-gods and expansionist,
bureaucratic systems. Again, perhaps this is satire.
But this satire falls apart when
you realise that the Primarchs of the Heresy are motivated not by unknowable,
godly whims, but by very human characteristics—father issues, bouts of rage,
jealousy, that existential loneliness. If a 12’ tall superhuman can wage war
because his dad didn’t love him enough, then there’s sure as hell space for one
waged for romance or sex. Same for those expansionist frameworks—historically,
and in these histories, tragically and abominably, wars for land expansion, to dispel
or remove “the other” from a specific area, have been motivated not just by
ideas of “empire” or “manifest destiny”, but also by a want to establish domesticity. Hell, even real-world political groups who want sexuality
eradicated from public discourse are motivated by it. Sexual-repression often
can’t be more euphemistic. Similarly, the human characters in the Black Library
novels and Codex lore excerpts should be motivated by coming home to a partner
or getting their kicks in at a club, but they’re just not.
You might argue that Warhammer is
a family-friendly game, and on the surface, I agree. The deeper lore, however, doesn’t
have to be; if Betrayer can write in detail on a daemonic flesh ritual
that mangles body and bone and blood, then I’m sure a book with a similar 13+ age
warning can get away with describing sexual desire (the distinction between the graphic nature of violence vs the graphic nature of sex having historic roots in religious orthodoxy), integrating it into both
plot and character without giving it to just Fulgrim. As Benedict goes on
to discuss in their essay, modern Blockbuster films are plagued with unattainable beautiful
bodies but no sex; it is an era of puritanical media, where overt sexuality is
reserved only for R-rated pictures. I don’t think what is being asked for here
is graphic sex in wider entertainment, but some acknowledgement that, between
consenting adult characters, sex is a human motivation and an aspect of
storytelling as old as storytelling itself.
On the flip-side, despite being,
and perhaps because of being, such a sexless setting, the Warhammer fan community
is endlessly horny. The pure amount of Eldar smut written out there is
astounding, as fans clamber to fill in the gaps (lol) that Games Workshop won’t.
That being said, pushing sex underground to explicit corners labelled as "kink" will
do more to stigmatise it rather than incorporating it into the setting as a part
of life.
Whenever someone brings up this sex
or sexuality in Warhammer, the knee-jerk, childish response is for someone to
shout “Slaanesh!” and that will be the end of the critical thinking. But Slaanesh is the
god of excess and wantonness, the logical extreme of every human desire. Not
just the god of sex. It would be like shouting “Khorne!” to shut down any
discussion of representation of violence in Warhammer, which I think is fine
and fun when you’re 12 years old, but you’d hope as fans mature, so might their
engagement with the themes of the setting. At the same time, I don’t think
Slaanesh’s relationship with sex should be downplayed or eradicated by the lore
either, it just shouldn’t be the only representation of sex in the
setting, else immature and bigoted fans will just continue to equate sex,
gender and sexual-orientation with heresy or deviancy. And they are not. They are
things than happen and occur in real life (that can be both as innocent and
selfish as any other human act or emotion).
In discussion threads surrounding
the implementation of more sexuality and romance into the setting, there are
many parroted cries and suggestions that Games Workshop should introduce a
series of novels like Warhammer Horror or Warhammer Crime to introduce “Warhammer
Romance”. This would be a huge mistake. To relegate sexuality and romance to a
webstore only series of novels would be worse than it not existing at all. It sends
a message that sex is a separate genre to the rest of the setting, that it is
an alien, unknowable thing, ripe for uninformed parody or general memeing and
mockery by the community, in the same way that Slaanesh is now, or in the wider
world, sex scenes and adult magazines are. Relegating something intensely human
to a “locked-away”, private sphere of life alienates the subject and others it.
The complete opposite of what we want here. We don’t want a tiny section of “Warhammer
Romance”. We just want romance. Let it motivate characters. A Commissar driven by his need to cover up an affair. A Space
Marine yearning for a sexuality that was taken from them before reconditioning.
It may not sound as cool as chainswords and titans, but it’s as much as part of
life and death and war as is murder and betrayal and the taxation of trade
routes.
Perhaps there might be some inspiration found in a little 1979 film... |
I agree with it. And to add I think the silly obsession people have against sister of battle chest armor being sexualized is fruit of this no sex mentality between 40k fandom and western media family BS in the current era. Its a shame to shame people who want kinky models in the setting. They can't express their tastes because some dude will shout that armor ain't military enough and the body look like porn stuff and so on. I glad I found this essay, because if one thinks about it the main reason people even want space marines to be female inclusive is out of shame they can't look at the latex power dom sister of battle without getting red at the cheeks.
ReplyDelete